home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20010921-20020314
/
000324_satprof@altavista.com_Mon Jan 28 09:32:07 EST 2002.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2002-03-13
|
1KB
|
28 lines
Article: 13162 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: satprof@altavista.com (satprof)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Evaluation of K95
Date: 28 Jan 2002 05:13:54 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <c4914b87.0201280513.16dbc7a5@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.128.200.252
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1012223635 15984 127.0.0.1 (28 Jan 2002 13:13:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jan 2002 13:13:55 GMT
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:13162
Does anyone know of a way of evaluating K95 (v.1.1.20) now that the
demo version has been withdrawn? I need to see if it is going to solve
my specific file-transfer problem before buying several copies.
My requirement is for a solid & reliable overnight transfer of about
70MB via double satellite links (~ 300kbps), with the possibility of
data validation & restarts. Has anyone here any experience with such a
set-up?
Thanks for your time.